Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Abortion and infanticide: why the parent–child relationship symmetry breaker fails
  1. Joshua William Holt
  1. UGA, Athens, Georgia, USA
  1. Correspondence to Joshua William Holt; jholt4432{at}gmail.com

Abstract

Some pro-life philosophers have argued that if one accepts abortion, one should accept infanticide. Prabhpal Singh has proposed a symmetry breaker. He argues that the parent–child relationship can only be obtained between born humans and such a relationship entails that infanticide is wrong. I consider this account and argue that not only is its central claim, that only born humans can stand in a parent–child relationship, unmotivated, but even if accepted, it would still not explain why infanticide is wrong.

  • Abortion - Induced
  • Infanticide

Data availability statement

No data are available.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Data availability statement

No data are available.

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Contributors JWH is the sole author and developer of the paper. JWH is also the guarantor.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Linked Articles